Summary of Session Two, Part 2

NETWORKING
Convener: Associate Professor Dr. Krassimir Petkov
 

netpan01.jpg (103208 bytes) University of Sofia Associate Professor Dr. Krassimir Petkov delivers the opening remarks to the networking session as Dr. Alexander Dimchev, Dr. Dincho Krastev, and University of Kansas Librarian are preparing their replies. 

Presenter: Associate Professor Dr. Alexander Dimchev, University of Sofia,
“Bulgarian Libraries in the Global Network Environment.”

For over 5,000 years, libraries have been preserving the memories of humanity. The library can be termed as the primary resource for the new information revolution. Libraries are facing competition. Quo vadis? Please allow me to use the metaphor of the octopus and the pearl shell. What are the chances for the Bulgarian libraries in the next few years. Only a small percent of the population can afford to buy books. Only 3.5% of the population uses the Internet. There are about 200 Internet providers in the country. There is growth in the market for information technologies. Bulgaria is lagging a bit behind compared to other eastern European countries in terms of availability of information technologies. The financial funds for the libraries have 72% spent on salaries and administrative expenses. The libraries try to fund raise. They succeed in raising about 20% of their funds. There are some donors such as the Open Society Fund. These funds impact the character of the collections. Foreign literature is usually donated. A favorable picture for Bulgarian libraries is seen in terms of donations. Bulgaria is currently working to build a national information network. About 50 libraries have access to the Internet. A positive factor is the emergence of professional organizations. The first NGO to submit draft laws to the legislature. You need positive government policies and sufficient funding. Don’t want libraries to be turned into pearl shells without their pearls.

Question: Concerning the data, why the decrease in the number of readers, aside from government policies?

Response: The lack of technology is a serious problem. Other problems are lack of effective marketing and a humble attitude that is inculcated in librarians.

Comment: Besides the dark picture Dimchev presented, not everything can be bought by money. I am deeply convinced we do a lot with the university graduates. They are younger and have a good awareness of the modern world.

Question: You said that there is a decreasing number of readers. My personal impression is that there is an increase in the number of readers. To the Library Association: What can we do in terms of training to improve librarians’ performance?

Question: I work in the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. Decision makers who develop strategies under the new conditions should change their mentality. Should get rid of the idea that we all need to make money. I hope that investments in libraries will eventually have cost recovery. There is a need to start thinking in new ways, for example to invest in human potential as well as technology. People outside our country lack knowledge about our country, our culture, our folklore, etc. We need to change this. Libraries charge fees for services, but what happens to the revenues?

Commentator: The Internet revolution is multiplied by two in Bulgaria in terms of the challenge that it represents. We [librarians] try to transform from boiled fish to live fish in our efforts to adapt to the challenges.

Question: What is the literacy rate in this country?

Response: This will be addressed in a later presentation.

Presenter: Dr.; Dincho Krastev, Central Library of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 
“Three Years Living with EARN, Five Years with Internet: An Optimistic Story of a Pessimist.”  

krastev01.jpg (80822 bytes) Dr. Dincho Krastev talks about the role the Internet has played in Bulgarian libraries. 

We are already in the mode of storytelling. This presentation will present a story to illustrate Professor Dimchev’s pessimistic portrayal that is actually a bit optimistic. Once upon a time, our library had access to a mainframe and a VAX machine. This was 1994. Computer database was accessed via punch cards. This database was lost in the transition to digital media since then. One challenge: Someone wanted to find out how to access someone in Poland with just a little information about him. The library was successful in finding this guy.  

barmar.jpg (76591 bytes) Emporia State University School of Library and Information Management student Brandon Barnett and Professor Maarten Van Veen, University of Applied Sciences Ijselland, listen intently to Central Library of the Bulgarian Academy of Science’s Dr. Dincho Krastev’s presentation. 

There was a shift to HTML and web browsers. We were more likely to view the glass as half full than half empty; there was a great deal of enthusiasm. J.D. Lickleider provided a correct model. From 1996, our library was trying to adapt itself to the net. Trying to implement computer-based processing and cataloguing. During the last 7-8 years, Bulgarian libraries have been somewhat successful in this, but not fully successful; only a small investment was allocated. Some successes in developing cataloging with minimal funding. Had to ask ourselves if this investment was justified. This was of great value in the early 1990s, but now in a time of virtual reality, the challenge is becoming more difficult. Budget for international periodicals has been reduced to one fourth of its size in the early 90s. At our library, our clients can search some online databases that we subscribe to. Often you can write to the author and he will send you a copy of an article so you can bypass the journal.

Visited the United States, including Boeing and Microsoft. Raised a challenge to western participants.

Russian anecdote: Where vodka appears, there will appear Russia. The same concept applies to the Internet.  

lars01.jpg (45416 bytes) University of Kansas Document Delivery Librarian Lars Leon, a School of Library and Information Graduate, chuckles at a joke made by Dr. Dincho Krastev.

Presenter: Lars Leon, Interlibrary Loan/Document Delivery Librarian, Watson Library, University of Kansas.
“Improving Access to Information through Interlibrary Loan Best Practices.”

Environment - University of Kansas

18,700 undergrad students

6,000 grad students in over 150 grad degrees

KU libraries - 3.3 million volumes, electronic resources budget, ILL/DD

Information is:

Our patrons are growing in number and type (e.g., distance education, adult learners) and very interested in accessing the full range of information. And most want it now!

Purchasing power can’t keep up with costs. We utilize interlibrary loan and document delivery to meet our patrons’ needs.

Challenges:

How to proceed?

What new systems should be used?

Is technology the only cure we need?

Best practices are highly effective or innovative operating procedures and philosophies that produce outstanding performance when implemented.

A noteworthy relevant publication is by Mary Jackson, Association of Research Libraries: “Measuring Performance of Interlibrary Loan Operations in North American Research & College Libraries”

Big Twelve Plus Libraries Consortium has 30 member libraries in the western half of the United States. Member libraries participate in Interlibrary Loan, do not charge for loans or copies to each other, use UPS or FedEx to ship loans to each other, and use Ariel for delivery of copies to each other.

Individual libraries implementing Best Practices is not enough. We evaluated the application of Best Practices on a consortium level.

Resource Sharing Strategy - evaluate and improve current ILL practices among member libraries within the framework of the NAILLD principles and in support of the consortium-wide system. (http://www.big12plus.org/strategicplan.htm)

The presenter surveyed Big Twelve Plus interlibrary loan colleagues on the following topics:

The Big Twelve Plus has established the following framework for best practices: Conceptual, Structural, and Procedural. Conceptual: Best practices at the highest level constitute the philosophical framework within which interlibrary loan operates and includes goals and standards. Structural are best practices at the middle level, providing an infrastructure that allows for the implementation of conceptual and procedural best practices. Procedural best practices are at the basic level and comprised of daily routines, procedures, tasks, and ways of processing the workload.

Standards are being developed. A standard is a reference point against which an organization may measure its operating procedures or outcomes. An example is that supplying libraries should supply loans so that the requesting library receives the material by the 5th OCLC referral day.

Benefits of best practices are enhanced through cooperation among libraries. Individual libraries using best practices will result in improved service. Requesting and supplying libraries’ use of best practices will result in more improved service. Group of libraries’ use of b est practices will result in the highest level of improved service.

For more information about the Big Twelve Plus Interlibary Loan Best Practices Task Force: http://www2.lib.ukans.edu/~public/btp/

dimchv02.jpg (82503 bytes) University of Sofia Associate Professor Alexander Dimchev listens to a presentation made during the networking session.

Back to Conference Notes